Very interesting - is that change documented somewhere? Couldn’t find it in the VMBC release notes. That being said, if I stick to the newer VMBC version (1.7) and use the older java bindings (2.0.1), then I notice the call returns very quickly. To produce the increased in latency, all I need to do is bump the version of the java bindings to 2.2.1. That would have to be due to a change in library or am I missing something? Perhaps it is the same issue as this CommandClient.submitAndWait non-blocking results - #3 by stefanobaghino-da ?
huw
5
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `submit` vs `submitAndWait` | 5 | 445 | February 16, 2023 | |
| submitAndWaitForResult - commands present twice? | 1 | 266 | January 16, 2023 | |
| CommandClient.submitAndWait non-blocking results | 5 | 547 | January 4, 2022 | |
| commandClient submit only answered 7 times by the ledger when using java bindings for 2.0 | 6 | 524 | April 28, 2022 | |
| Find transaction based on submission datapoints? | 8 | 276 | June 22, 2022 |